[pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (5931)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 07 December 2019 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35E1120830 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 11:47:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iG1BSnZn0De for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 11:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430E612082E for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 11:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 18F0EF4071B; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 11:47:08 -0800 (PST)
To: jimsch@augustcellars.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20191207194708.18F0EF4071B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 11:47:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/vtZbzddhRBfqK_YKxZzvNJrQbfc>
Subject: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (5931)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 19:47:16 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6402,
"Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5931

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>

Section: Appendix A.1

Original Text
-------------
    id-kp-cmcCA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 27 }
    id-kp-cmcRA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 28 }
    id-kp-cmcArchive OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 28 }

Corrected Text
--------------
    id-kp-cmcCA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 27 }
    id-kp-cmcRA OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 28 }
    id-kp-cmcArchive OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp 29 }

Notes
-----
id-kp-cmcRA and id-kp-cmcArchive are supposed to be different values.  This change matches what is already in Appendix A.2.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates
Publication Date    : November 2011
Author(s)           : J. Schaad
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG