Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0CF1321A3 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C06T7vWYpB2T for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C7D5132031 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s14so13205182pgs.1 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TsBz6cUgmM/GJ2DCEEhsHrR7UyCvgkKkAevKpyiyzbM=; b=Ju1GtLrogd0ikCk5vKOrMiuPx/Soc1Y4x4wuMbGE7zuTdiC+scKbiDUiAQ0wQeTxAk +yvDIcglYc8bnbsHz05VIvY1BKB1fMelqhuRgwtxkirj2n439H9NZ36mNlvVKD3TbhG2 sJ37YPJ5D3mDrqHDSEAlQF/2Dnue6ztrAIphB6Vz8YEvWe3XAv3MyM569R1JO1DiUuH7 T5LxvbphGJsS8fQezTEYFbkkoeOcyc6SRUvQQK6fPxzk8gCvagOI5P29329d1gx7ZlPn 053L4JZX6Y61gCvhHQkVm1XGaathp5GNT4/EhNDBKxBhTDYm+DGZA88zQhLW7DU199YT tfsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TsBz6cUgmM/GJ2DCEEhsHrR7UyCvgkKkAevKpyiyzbM=; b=ZisVxz+OpuXy3OgjK9ofVJ2Lnp4jyfBYzLjKrFfbV7Cm6rsM1h7r/rLjmURGpvfCPO 6PEfTH0PHQCithOz9CZdRQixGTkPbgECpDw2s8MrRhMd6asrfkkeKbLxqe5RDnVvNB0V Eh66NNPQTri9IW2Bnp1T0YbFRcyjf1B/YBw96FWrm3Gefpd6FBmxjsn3KhLcZLeznLSx JVVU2gZjJAvApjNOJD0CGYvs9Fo9t1uOHvQhXGfXLfNKJI6zSAQeqOvSbk29VicOHAGZ 666S6bPaHfiEr0Ozqh5puS4HgQe3SP+LAkcMBoKMex8TSCcJSoFv6hdDeFqF+hDSkguF n4cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iRBsltGXTbMcoW+Uzk2NNyO4xSFOMlh6ueNXGjjaKt6rnQ3NkR r1YypluYR9pIyGqv58MROQoBlRhw8w==
X-Received: by 10.84.210.175 with SMTP id a44mr1584763pli.274.1503422975672; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.144.1 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00d301d3183e$e1d15df0$a57419d0$@comodo.com>
References: <20170818150630.12CE1B814E2@rfc-editor.org> <EB29FEE8-AA80-48C7-A935-76CA419C21CB@vigilsec.com> <00d301d3183e$e1d15df0$a57419d0$@comodo.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:28:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4yDTKk2n_7DrzTpMGNKED6Scgy2C+EjbgtV-crb-1o7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip <philliph@comodo.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phillip.hallam-baker@comodo.com>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/ypRyxc8k300WHc0QNL7JzyGy24c>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:29:38 -0000

Thanks, Philip.  I see your point on errata of errata, but your errata
didn't fix the space, so HFDU seems right to me so this change isn't
forgotten.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Phillip <philliph@comodo.com> wrote:
> Please reject, Errata 5065 already updates this section, we should avoid
> errata of errata.
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6844&rec_status=15&presenta
> tion=records
>
> The second space does not worry me nearly as much as the issues to do with
> CNAME handling.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:15 AM
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>om>; Eric Rescorla
> <ekr@rtfm.com>
> Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phillip.hallam-baker@comodo.com>om>; Rob Stradling
> <rob.stradling@comodo.com>om>; IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)
>
> I do not think the extra space will confuse any implementers.  Also, since
> the LAMPS WG is considering a charter item to update this document, a
> resolution of "held for future update" seems right to me.
>
> Russ
>
>
>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 11:06 AM, RFC Errata System
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6844, "DNS
>> Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5091
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Mak Kolybabi <mak@kolybabi.com>
>>
>> Section: 4
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA(X), otherwise
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Remove unnecessary space after second CAA, making appearances of CAA(X)
> consistent throughout the section.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected.
>> When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change
>> the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6844 (draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA)
> Resource Record
>> Publication Date    : January 2013
>> Author(s)           : P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkix mailing list
>> pkix@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen