RE: specific policies used in conjunction with anyPolicy
Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com> Wed, 21 March 2001 21:38 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA16056 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:38:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA02058; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.imc.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:36:35 -0800
Received: from indy.gradient.com (root@indy.gradient.com [192.92.110.1]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02028 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bigbird.gradient.com (bigbird.gradient.com [192.92.110.50]) by indy.gradient.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA07081; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:36:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by bigbird.gradient.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id <G1NWH79J>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:33:04 -0500
Message-ID: <899128A30EEDD1118FC900A0C9C74A34BA96B2@bigbird.gradient.com>
From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>
To: 'Carlin Covey' <ccovey@cylink.com>, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>, Peter Williams <peterw@valicert.com>
Cc: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz, housley@spyrus.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, ietf-pkix@imc.org
Subject: RE: specific policies used in conjunction with anyPolicy
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:31:42 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
Maybe you should issue them OIDs. > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlin Covey [mailto:ccovey@cylink.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:29 PM > To: Michael Sierchio; Peter Williams > Cc: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz; housley@spyrus.com; tim.polk@nist.gov; > ietf-pkix@imc.org > Subject: RE: specific policies used in conjunction with anyPolicy > > > Peter and Peter, > > Are you distinct? I'm a bit fuzzy myself. ;>) > > -----Original Message----- > From: kudzu@sapphire.tenebras.com > [mailto:kudzu@sapphire.tenebras.com]On > Behalf Of Michael Sierchio > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:26 PM > To: Peter Williams > Cc: 'pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz'; ccovey@cylink.com; > housley@spyrus.com; > tim.polk@nist.gov; ietf-pkix@imc.org > Subject: Re: specific policies used in conjunction with anyPolicy > > > Peter Williams wrote: > > > > Is it the usual free-for-all where noone knows anything and you just > choose > > your own OID? > > Are Peter Williams and Peter Gutmann distinct persons? >
- specific policies used in conjunction with anyPol… Carlin Covey
- Re: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Peter Gutmann
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Peter Williams
- Re: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Michael Sierchio
- Re: specific policies used in conjunction with an… David A. Cooper
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Carlin Covey
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Hal Lockhart
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Peter Gutmann
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Roger Younglove
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Trevor Freeman
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… David A. Cooper
- RE: specific policies used in conjunction with an… Trevor Freeman