Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 26 May 2019 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D771201BB for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i12U3D61JSP for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631A31201B3 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B75300AE0 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qXMty91TQumn for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD65F3005AB; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190526031152.147B8B82CD0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 12:38:04 -0400
Cc: IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73AA806C-F623-4EDB-9F5B-180EA2DE5E16@vigilsec.com>
References: <20190526031152.147B8B82CD0@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/zdN-WhrdlYlcEr11W7iObUhHwTY>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 16:38:13 -0000
I do not think an implementer will be confused here. So, I suggest "hold for future update". Russ > On May 25, 2019, at 11:11 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5019, > "The Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5740 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Jaime Hablutzel <hablutzel1@gmail.com> > > Section: 2.2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to > an OCSP request containing a option not supported by the server, it > SHOULD return the most complete response it can. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to > an OCSP request containing an option not supported by the server, it > SHOULD return the most complete response it can. > > Notes > ----- > "a option" should be "an option" > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5019 (draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments > Publication Date : September 2007 > Author(s) : A. Deacon, R. Hurst > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
- [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Sean Turner
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Manger, James
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5… Jaime Hablutzel