Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 26 May 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D771201BB for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i12U3D61JSP for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631A31201B3 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B75300AE0 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qXMty91TQumn for <pkix@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD65F3005AB; Sun, 26 May 2019 12:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190526031152.147B8B82CD0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 12:38:04 -0400
Cc: IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73AA806C-F623-4EDB-9F5B-180EA2DE5E16@vigilsec.com>
References: <20190526031152.147B8B82CD0@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/zdN-WhrdlYlcEr11W7iObUhHwTY>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5019 (5740)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 16:38:13 -0000

I do not think an implementer will be confused here.  So, I suggest "hold for future update".

Russ


> On May 25, 2019, at 11:11 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5019,
> "The Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5740
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Jaime Hablutzel <hablutzel1@gmail.com>;
> 
> Section: 2.2.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to
> an OCSP request containing a option not supported by the server, it
> SHOULD return the most complete response it can.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In the case where a responder does not have the ability to respond to
> an OCSP request containing an option not supported by the server, it
> SHOULD return the most complete response it can.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> "a option" should be "an option"
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5019 (draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments
> Publication Date    : September 2007
> Author(s)           : A. Deacon, R. Hurst
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix