Re: [pkng] json-dsig anyone?

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Mon, 22 March 2010 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC5C3A68B6 for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rE2BwXXnRgH for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A70B3A68AF for <pkng@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.27.189] (dhcp-wireless-open-abg-27-189.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.27.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2MLUwZj008968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pkng@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:31:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4BA7E192.90408@sunet.se>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:30:58 +0100
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Lightning/1.0b1 Shredder/3.0.3pre ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pkng@irtf.org
References: <4BA666E4.2050408@sunet.se> <p062408bec7cc34119aaa@[10.20.30.158]> <328D39B3-2FE9-4962-BC84-E17BB280504C@cs.tcd.ie> <4BA7B3FD.2070102@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <4BA7B3FD.2070102@sunet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 193.10.252.66
Subject: Re: [pkng] json-dsig anyone?
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:30:56 -0000

On 03/22/2010 07:16 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>
>> Eh ... What is "for now" again? Hard to recall with so little happening.
>> Maybe letting formatters run free might help?
>> (not a criticism since I also probably promised to do stuff but just a
>> suggestion)
>
> Personally I think this question is a consequence of the "must be easier
> to deploy" requirement. I ass u me :-) that something might
> look like a signature of something which might have to live in the
> browser and I don't think that is jumping too far ahead quite
> frankly :-)

Found this 
http://salmon-protocol.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/draft-panzer-magicsig-00.html

	Cheers Leif