Re: [pkng] Where to go? What to do?

Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu> Fri, 01 October 2010 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5173A6DFF for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-dql91ncjFd for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub2.dartmouth.edu (mailhub2.dartmouth.edu [129.170.17.107]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8533A6CA0 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newblitzen.Dartmouth.EDU (newblitzen.Dartmouth.EDU [129.170.208.36]) by mailhub2.dartmouth.edu (8.13.5/DND2.0/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o91Jo1Fo027528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pkng@irtf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:27:37 -0400
X-Disclaimer: This message was received from outside Dartmouth's BlitzMail system.
Received: from dhcp-212-226.cs.dartmouth.edu [129.170.212.226] by newblitzen.Dartmouth.EDU (Mac) via SMTP for pkng@irtf.org id <177895990>; 01 Oct 2010 16:27:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4CA644CF.6090704@Dartmouth.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:30:07 -0400
From: Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu>
Organization: Dartmouth College / OpenCA Labs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.0.7-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pkng@irtf.org
References: <p06240825c8c7fd5ca338@[10.20.30.163]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240825c8c7fd5ca338@[10.20.30.163]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010001000505070603080205"
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean by mailhub2.dartmouth.edu
X-MailScanner-From: massimiliano.pala@dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: [pkng] Where to go? What to do?
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:27:06 -0000

Dear list...

Since we are discussing the possible activities for the WG...

One small remark (and it could totally lame to remind the list this),
the IPv4 address space assignments are going to run out in less than a year...

My question is: shall we consider the impact of the new address space on
applications and network layer trust ? Is there any special requirement
we shall explicitly consider in the WG work or not ?

Later,
Max


On 09/28/2010 04:22 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. This list has not been used to good measure yet, and it is not clear
> if it will be. This would be a good time to find out.