Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG
Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Wed, 13 October 2010 05:51 UTC
Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD163A68AE for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qehrX7+tZd4t for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D553A6774 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [78.65.233.129] (host-78-65-233-129.homerun.telia.com [78.65.233.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9D5qqIN017107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pkng@irtf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:52:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4CB54934.1090603@sunet.se>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:52:52 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pkng@irtf.org
References: <p06240861c8da6274a3ab@[192.168.0.4]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240861c8da6274a3ab@[192.168.0.4]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:51:44 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 09:09 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > I think the RG does not have the juice that we had hoped for originally, and it's OK to shut it down. Some of the ideas will resurface as IETF work, but without the research-y discussion that might improve them early on. The world doesn't need yet another mailing list to discuss these topics, and when post-PKIX PKI topics appear, they can create their own mailing lists. > Could you explain the juice-level we would have to have in order to be an RG? I ws under the impression that RGs don't have to be productive and on schedule as WG does... Cheers Leif -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAky1STQACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnelOgCfRfSiEHHRkGx6rR/rFRZbn+qT zAoAn2epYh6oC4hWhTfT1E0Rn4lwWm9A =PlhQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG Leif Johansson
- [pkng] Request to shut down this RG Paul Hoffman
- Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pkng] Request to shut down this RG Leif Johansson