IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkng] json-dsig anyone?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 22 March 2010 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E153A698B for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hYuXRa3osWyW for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.newbay.com (87-198-172-198.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.172.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720503A6941 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.newbay.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469F3360089; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:44 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at newbay.com
Received: from mail.newbay.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.newbay.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bl3ePPrzO18r; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail01.newbay.com (mail01.newbay.com [192.168.12.25]) by mail.newbay.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F13360088; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.newbay.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08307C309; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at newbay.com
Received: from mail01.newbay.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.newbay.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJJflabUapbZ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [130.129.24.49] (unknown [130.129.24.49]) by mail01.newbay.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D2E7C12D; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:34 +0000 (GMT)
References: <4BA666E4.2050408@sunet.se> <p062408bec7cc34119aaa@[10.20.30.158]>
Message-Id: <328D39B3-2FE9-4962-BC84-E17BB280504C@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <p062408bec7cc34119aaa@[10.20.30.158]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18)
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:14:29 -0700
Cc: "pkng@irtf.org" <pkng@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [pkng] json-dsig anyone?
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:14:40 -0000

On 21 Mar 2010, at 13:38, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> At 7:35 PM +0100 3/21/10, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> I've been thinking that whatever pkng winds up looking like it will  
>> probably have to be easily integratable in front channel interfaces
>> and support multiple representations. Today that means json...
>>
>> I started to look for evidence for work on "json-dsig" and found
>> this:
>>
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Canonical_JSON
>>
>> Does anyone have contacts into OPLC and/or know something about this
>> stuff and why they'd be interested?
>
> As everyone should remember, "formats" is for later, not now.

Eh ... What is "for now" again? Hard to recall with so little  
happening. Maybe letting formatters run free might help?
(not a criticism since I also probably promised to do stuff but just a  
suggestion)

S

> Having said that, it is well worth being sure that a format we might  
> want to use can be canonicalized, and that maybe someoe has thought  
> about how to associate a signature with a blob.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> pkng mailing list
> pkng@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email