Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Tue, 12 April 2011 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E29AE07D5 for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXzf8oMZqoLc for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB2DE07C2 for <plasma@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.240.93.191] (pub93-191.pub.luth.se [130.240.93.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3CELPap024822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <plasma@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:21:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DA45FE5.3020102@mnt.se>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:21:25 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: plasma@ietf.org
References: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D2F49734F@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D2F49734F@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:21:31 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/06/2011 09:33 PM, Trevor Freeman wrote:
> Stephen Farrell asked why not use Web portal mail? Why do we need to develop plasma?

Maybe that question is easier to answer if we consider plasma for XMPP
and not just for email. There are important differences between XMPP
and email that make it much more challenging to build web-only versions
of the XMPP.

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2kX+UACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndeOwCcC1BQafbUXYLHJZKxsuAcV8eS
6ukAnA0JGhMsLdmh+WG+GqEUoVMWj7+e
=5lPF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----