Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Wed, 13 April 2011 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073B3E06A5 for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jD2M4nGMd-gC for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080EAE069F for <plasma@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.240.93.191] (pub93-191.pub.luth.se [130.240.93.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3D8MOMm028605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:22:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DA55D40.8040306@mnt.se>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:22:24 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
References: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D2F49734F@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <4DA45FE5.3020102@mnt.se> <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D339D7F4B@DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <4DA4BC30.7060308@mnt.se> <4DA4BC92.6070701@stpeter.im> <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D339E0DEF@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D339E0DEF@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "plasma@ietf.org" <plasma@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:22:35 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/13/2011 01:11 AM, Trevor Freeman wrote:
> I realize at the physical level with IM it uses a sequence of messages which hare relayed server to server. Just as with VoIP, an audio stream is packaged as a sequence of IP packets. However there is no concept of long term persistence of information outside of the IM session (I am ignoring auditing). I don’t have an IM inbox.
> 
> The closest I can get is if I persist my IM history I would invoke the policy but it's not intuitive I would spawn more im sessions based on that as I would forward or reply all with email. 

Yes you do! XEP-0060 is exactly your XMPP inbox.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2lXUAACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnei6QCeNXQ5S0rMvwkoEQxkhjr1OEPh
j+wAn1dkalg+lZBnxzbhbJUVrwmIpE9e
=WnBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----