[plasma] Plasma and File protection Question

Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com> Tue, 19 April 2011 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4ECE081F for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqro6Bffq0bI for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.exchange.microsoft.com (mail7.exchange.microsoft.com [131.107.1.27]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162A4E086D for <plasma@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from df-h14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) by DF-G14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:08 -0700
Received: from PIO-MLT-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.94.24) by DF-H14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:08 -0700
Received: from DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::7c94:4036:120:c95f]) by PIO-MLT-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::d57f:521a:3ae6:c130%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:19:08 -0700
From: Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: "plasma@ietf.org" <plasma@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Plasma and File protection Question
Thread-Index: Acv+12enYPbxA8mtTICquFGvp+a95A==
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:19:07 +0000
Message-ID: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D33A0036D@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.101]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D33A0036DDFM1412exchange_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [plasma] Plasma and File protection Question
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:19:13 -0000

Having agreed that files and are the conceptually the same as email from a policy access control perspective, there is one important distinction.

Email has a standard mechanism to define multiple parts of a message to represent different aspects of the message i.e. MIME.

We don't have that for files so we don't have a simple generic way to attach the extra metadata to a file.

Some standard file formats have specific extension mechanisms we can use e.g. OOXML which would allow you to define a way to attach the plasma metadata to the file type in question.

Alternatively there exist generic file container standards what can hold any combination of files and data e.g. OPC which would provide a generic solution for any file type.

If we were to expand files for consideration with Plasma, which would be the best first step, a specific solution like OOXML or a generic solution such as OPC?

Dr Trevor Freeman  Senior Security Strategist
End to End Trust Team<http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/endtoendtrust/default.mspx>
Microsoft Trustworthy Computing <http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/default.mspx>