Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB280E067F for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id scnAWLKbBTkF for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.exchange.microsoft.com (mail7.exchange.microsoft.com [131.107.1.27]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB61E07D5 for <plasma@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from df-h14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.140) by DF-G14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:47 -0700
Received: from PIO-MLT-05.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.94.22) by DF-H14-02.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:47 -0700
Received: from DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::cc46:3da5:bed6:8dfc]) by PIO-MLT-05.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::d940:e316:1daa:5e6a%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:47 -0700
From: Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, "plasma@ietf.org" <plasma@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
Thread-Index: Acv0kXrWGetxV1fRTF6d/JQ0xrOecQExhkeAAAW7cdA=
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:41:46 +0000
Message-ID: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D339D7F4B@DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D2F49734F@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <4DA45FE5.3020102@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <4DA45FE5.3020102@mnt.se>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:41:49 -0000
If you consider XMPP case it is easier because there is no expectation of data persistence. It's a synchronous protocol where all parties are online together exchanging information and that information is not persisted one the session is ended. -----Original Message----- From: plasma-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:plasma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 7:21 AM To: plasma@ietf.org Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/2011 09:33 PM, Trevor Freeman wrote: > Stephen Farrell asked why not use Web portal mail? Why do we need to develop plasma? Maybe that question is easier to answer if we consider plasma for XMPP and not just for email. There are important differences between XMPP and email that make it much more challenging to build web-only versions of the XMPP. Cheers Leif -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2kX+UACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndeOwCcC1BQafbUXYLHJZKxsuAcV8eS 6ukAnA0JGhMsLdmh+WG+GqEUoVMWj7+e =5lPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ plasma mailing list plasma@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma
- [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Whitlock, Stephen
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Leif Johansson
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Leif Johansson
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Leif Johansson
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Leif Johansson
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Leif Johansson
- Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? Trevor Freeman