Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 12 April 2011 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E27BE0933 for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDiHUgfN4VGJ for <plasma@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57914E092F for <plasma@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com [64.101.72.245]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0168440D20; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:59:48 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DA4BC92.6070701@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:56:50 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
References: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D2F49734F@DF-M14-12.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <4DA45FE5.3020102@mnt.se> <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D339D7F4B@DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> <4DA4BC30.7060308@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <4DA4BC30.7060308@mnt.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050103050102010708010206"
Cc: "plasma@ietf.org" <plasma@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail?
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:56:53 -0000

On 4/12/11 2:55 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 08:41 PM, Trevor Freeman wrote:
>> If you consider XMPP case it is easier because there is no expectation of data persistence. It's a synchronous protocol where all parties are online together exchanging information and that information is not persisted one the session is ended.
> 
> Ah no most XMPP deployments does store-and-forward (offline messages I
> think its called).

Correct:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0160.html

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/