IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [plasma] Delegation scenario

Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com> Fri, 28 October 2011 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: plasma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: plasma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B39B11E8089 for <plasma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5K0yJegTMW9p for <plasma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.exchange.microsoft.com (mail1.exchange.microsoft.com [131.107.1.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8B821F8A4E for <plasma@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from df-h14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) by DF-G14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.87.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.2; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:14 -0700
Received: from PIO-MLT-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.94.24) by DF-H14-01.exchange.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.78.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.202.4; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:14 -0700
Received: from DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::cc46:3da5:bed6:8dfc]) by PIO-MLT-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com ([fe80::d57f:521a:3ae6:c130%10]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.002; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:48:14 -0700
From: Trevor Freeman <trevorf@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: "Fitch, Scott C" <scott.c.fitch@lmco.com>, "plasma@ietf.org" <plasma@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Delegation scenario
Thread-Index: AcyTPvJuZ6lTqdglQi+54J/v8g5UNQCWpMtQ
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:48:13 +0000
Message-ID: <E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D42750872@DF-M14-11.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <DFE85D7EFA640D4886E9A9141AEBCD200A097B8A@HDXDSP11.us.lmco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DFE85D7EFA640D4886E9A9141AEBCD200A097B8A@HDXDSP11.us.lmco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.100]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E545B914D50B2A4B994F198378B1525D42750872DFM1411exchange_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [plasma] Delegation scenario
X-BeenThere: plasma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The PoLicy Augmented S/Mime \(plasma\) bof discussion list." <plasma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/plasma>
List-Post: <mailto:plasma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma>, <mailto:plasma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:48:27 -0000

That is a good observation. If you give a brief outline on how you see a scenario changing for delegation and I will incorporate that into the next version.

From: plasma-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:plasma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fitch, Scott C
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:57 AM
To: plasma@ietf.org
Subject: [plasma] Delegation scenario

Plasma also opens up the opportunity to support delegation in a much more sustainable and elegant manner than current PKI-based S/MIME. I'd like to see that called out as a scenario in Section 3. Others have similar thoughts?

                -Scott

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email