IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PMOL] FW: [IPPM] FWD: LIAISON STATEMENT FROM THE BROADBAND FORUM

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 05 September 2012 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147F321F847B for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 05:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.515, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjhPezB2MsLv for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 05:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DE921F8468 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 05:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-10) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id ad947405.0.557839.00-454.1524238.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <acmorton@att.com>); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:47:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 504749db7ff6e288-9776029a1f88a3e93dab848aa2a385068d9b4e1c
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q85ClMOm022967 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:47:22 -0400
Received: from sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (sflint01.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.228]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q85ClHP6022947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:47:18 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:47:01 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q85Cl1nm027234 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:47:01 -0400
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q85CkpnX026664 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:46:56 -0400
Message-Id: <201209051246.q85CkpnX026664@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (vpn-135-70-196-48.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.196.48](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20120905124623gw100sspdte>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:46:25 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.196.48]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:45:49 -0400
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, pmol@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04080C142B@307622ANEX5.globa l.avaya.com>
References: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9045627F6@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <201209041320.q84DKuw9024588@alpd052.aldc.att.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04080C142B@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <acmorton@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=5OA5Q0ntZfkA:10 a=DbBEmFV2Wm4A:10 a=ofMgfj31e3]
X-AnalysisOut: [cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8]
X-AnalysisOut: [UMqPvVAA==:17 a=wiVUnZuSIUv_NmhEdFAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=_W_S_7VecoQA:10]
Cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [PMOL] FW: [IPPM] FWD: LIAISON STATEMENT FROM THE BROADBAND FORUM
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate list <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:47:24 -0000

Hi Dan,

At 07:33 AM 9/5/2012, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

One question – you wrote:

Ø       IMO, the next steps are to agree on a test architecture and
divide the work of metric definition, methods of measurement,
and supporting protocol development among SDOs

Do you believe that there is a need for new protocol development for BB access performance?

Not necessarily new protocols, but likely protocol extensions
to enable control among the various entities in the TBD architecture.
For example, we have OWAMP and TWAMP test protocols, but they probably
don't yet specify all the controls needed. Once the results are
measured, how are they transferred for further processing,
display, and archiving? What could we augment to do this efficiently?

And, what SDO has the mandate to determine the testing architecture?

Al


v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email