IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 12 September 2012 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F75421F859C for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.259
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.339, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YfSDE-dl-Ni for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B658221F858F for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAL+zUFDGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABFgkunYYhGAYhVgQeCIAEBAQEDEgoRA0kQAgEIDQEDBAEBCwYMCwEGAUUJCAEBBAESCBqHawuedJ04ixCFYmADlnOEbYoegmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,411,1344225600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="324470820"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2012 12:07:19 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2012 12:04:47 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD9101.4A4DAFF7"
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:11:37 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04081297A7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <5050B187.9020307@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents
Thread-Index: Ac2Q/7YILOphgNMcR3W3c4UXMJ059AAAVSkQ
References: <5050B187.9020307@cisco.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, pmol@ietf.org
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate list <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:11:48 -0000

FWIW - I am shepherding the first document as XRBLOCK WG chair, and Al
Morton who is an active contributor in the XRBLOCK WG has carefully
reviewed it (I believe). 

 

Dan

 

 

 

From: pmol-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pmol-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Benoit Claise
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:00 PM
To: pmol@ietf.org
Cc: Ron Bonica; Gonzalo Camarillo; Robert Sparks
Subject: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents

 

Hi Directorate,

I wonder if the PMOL has to say something regarding these two drafts,
which are on the IESG telechat tomorrow.
Very sorry about this late notice:

    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-05
    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch/

Do you believe that PMOL directorate should really review these two?
There is always the possibility to defer the two drafts, even if it's
not ideal

Note: I will review the drafts now.


Regards, Benoit.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email