Re: [pmtud] Re: [Tsvwg] Working group last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01

Hi James,

it seems that you both think that the IANA section will stay. So the
reference to the link should stay. I can make it an Informative  
Reference.
OK?

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 14, 2006, at 7:21 AM, James M. Polk wrote:

> At 02:06 PM 10/14/2006 +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> On Oct 14, 2006, at 14:03, James M. Polk wrote:
>>> SCTP-AUTH has a large and well written IANA section, and is not
>>> void of doing anything, so I'm confused by comparing what happens
>>> to Padding with what happens to AUTH.  Lars, can you explain your
>>> comments some more?
>>
>> SCTP-AUTH currently says:
>>
>>       NOTE to RFC-Editor:
>>
>>       "RFCXXXX" is to be replaced by the RFC number you assign this
>>       document.
>>
>>       The reference to sctp-parameters [7] should be removed from the
>>       "Normative References" section after the IANA section has been
>>       removed.
>>
>> The IANA section should NOT be removed here either.
>
> I read the above as stating the reference (#7 in the references  
> section) should be removed, not the IANA section, which is how I'm  
> reading what you are implying you think the doc is asking to do.
>
>
>> Lars
>> --
>> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network  
>> Laboratories
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
pmtud@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud