Re: [pmtud] Re: [Tsvwg] Working group last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Sat, 14 October 2006 05:21 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYbxa-0000DL-56; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYbxY-0000DA-NN; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:20 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYbxW-0000z4-Bu; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:20 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2006 22:21:18 -0700
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9E5LIv7022344; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:18 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k9E5LHDM009992; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:17 -0400
Received: from jmpolk-wxp.cisco.com ([10.89.20.176]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:21:16 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20061014001939.023847a8@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: jmpolk@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:21:15 -0500
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [pmtud] Re: [Tsvwg] Working group last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01
In-Reply-To: <235E4A93-1CF9-4E4C-B612-66B4C4330979@netlab.nec.de>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20061014000127.0247aee8@email.cisco.com> <A2CF9A9D-E08B-488B-BAF6-1BB07D720C33@lurchi.franken.de> <451B9B8F.8000607@ericsson.com> <E05CFB40-21C8-4D31-99E8-9BCA43A8C1BD@netlab.nec.de> <A2CF9A9D-E08B-488B-BAF6-1BB07D720C33@lurchi.franken.de> <4.3.2.7.2.20061014000127.0247aee8@email.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2006 05:21:17.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[930DDFE0:01C6EF50]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1013; t=1160803278; x=1161667278; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[pmtud]=20Re=3A=20[Tsvwg]=20Working=20group=20last=20call=20on=0 A=20=20draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01 |To:Lars=20Eggert=20<lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dt912MrNCUeXQtaIsb2RpYVxqj6U=3D; b=l/z7ZE01ECegFtyr2tyXQ989DuHK1UrdcYqoxyUK+f473jSWDzGis1LFAuT3uDbD+ESezTSn JAw/1D7+lSszkV1ALEJmrhllFg4dOo8kp4x5jhdlTa2YeUyI4V6bWYfl;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, Path MTU Discovery WG <pmtud@ietf.org>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: pmtud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery <pmtud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud>, <mailto:pmtud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pmtud>
List-Post: <mailto:pmtud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmtud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud>, <mailto:pmtud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pmtud-bounces@ietf.org

At 02:06 PM 10/14/2006 +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
>On Oct 14, 2006, at 14:03, James M. Polk wrote:
>>SCTP-AUTH has a large and well written IANA section, and is not
>>void of doing anything, so I'm confused by comparing what happens
>>to Padding with what happens to AUTH.  Lars, can you explain your
>>comments some more?
>
>SCTP-AUTH currently says:
>
>       NOTE to RFC-Editor:
>
>       "RFCXXXX" is to be replaced by the RFC number you assign this
>       document.
>
>       The reference to sctp-parameters [7] should be removed from the
>       "Normative References" section after the IANA section has been
>       removed.
>
>The IANA section should NOT be removed here either.

I read the above as stating the reference (#7 in the references section) 
should be removed, not the IANA section, which is how I'm reading what you 
are implying you think the doc is asking to do.


>Lars
>--
>Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
pmtud@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud