Re: [pntaw] New version of draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5273021F9CC5 for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 867hovNJNEpE for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AED221F9C60 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y10so2859541wgg.12 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7fcZGUN08yu2hUIrEqnPYL0oy/5nbXHpVnPLypdhDRo=; b=0lW3GHJRk4jWXCRzcM3VV4UNR5Nx3+3X6pk0NMWL94mDawNlr3WvdgY9cH9nYtP62q 8al+Xru4Y7+ANEeRaRtqtuUCkkNP89SDNbckcZv19KLvrUfHud2nDpWy1BqiP8vDdtf4 MFshD1cfn20JZMRMEUPQAr9OYFU4JTjhpB2yApYuYU6UiRSUkjsysDUliKXPhkjikuTv QMf+NLb/ZwDdox012ki16F/1g0NUiZkryy79u2UDDpyZz0nNuQeD2Dlqtg0tMxXCq6dU x06E1EnBgrkRtrCXty+ufZZPCjm5y5SUJS9hXkDpVLDKmy2agWy8m3Jp4KKJMagcCdEf ltzw==
X-Received: by 10.194.5.35 with SMTP id p3mr577008wjp.47.1379926818838; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.45] (54.Red-83-61-124.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.61.124.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ey2sm24070328wib.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52400320.2070404@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:00:16 +0200
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17BCF3A5@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>, , <523CCD06.3030902@gmail.com>, <BLU169-W136A55AC013DA147313576D93220@phx.gbl>, <523CD42E.8070102@gmail.com> <BLU169-W82036280852F26ED26283C93230@phx.gbl>, <523D4F17.2040202@gmail.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17BD01A8@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17BD01A8@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "pntaw@ietf.org" <pntaw@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pntaw] New version of draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
X-BeenThere: pntaw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for practices related to proxies, NATs, TURN, and WebRTC" <pntaw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw>
List-Post: <mailto:pntaw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:00:20 -0000

El 22/09/2013 0:48, Hutton, Andrew escribió:
> I just don't see any advantage in the TURN over Websockets approach over the HTTP Connect initiated tunnel which works without any new protocol and therefore works with existing TURN servers.

How about transparent proxying?

Best regards
Sergio