IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pntaw] More on draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations

Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> Tue, 24 September 2013 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mom040267@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09DA11E815B for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i8mz5j1XhDuL for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF9E11E815A for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bj1so3796972pad.21 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qLtrGLZfRq+UD/cxC16zjAgVy8otp0MkoGNt/L+vpcQ=; b=vaFRS0Yw2pM3eqweGKRtlWtQ93dYLo2NarluoSVyvZF+eYRgxmTrnsYubVZhXnH+o0 /Pd3faQpK7MiZxRvXxNikMbCcMX20pyx7SlKNAorHPdcAsDqs9Fg6mqU0iFKDeHb3WaV I41BTEYXCHkC2W2AA89gy0iKSBFx3Agrxpg8zXiQrvy8dFpb4XhhS7uLHoIur/TH3qBp jYu3O72KQNi36NwbAAaK2IVAhQPNA0CglIlGRdCQBRtTBNTfFHmyu/lU589okmtHWXMP hxn2jWjr/UH8m4d1Jq+gRr0NMFH/YDyWmRFjRf6/0mJOY2pRR1jh9u154cNDeTuO+MYz s2AQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.76.1 with SMTP id g1mr2070835pbw.109.1380035338003; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.91.163 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5241A7E7.8070101@viagenie.ca>
References: <52411CD5.1050909@gmail.com> <CALDtMr+O8__AUk9qXm9yz4ePNtV_n=V31oHNQ_a068viV_uZYg@mail.gmail.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A1907DC09@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CALDtMrKOdWSRxM4c_XW7rv6_hTcsa_Zp2A+83zoK3+fHYR0rrA@mail.gmail.com> <5241A7E7.8070101@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:08:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CALDtMrK1z8j5nRv36nMRxzkmHVwmNL1whfAvvyTvVuv1A_DiOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6d7abe1979b904e72284b3"
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "pntaw@ietf.org" <pntaw@ietf.org>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [pntaw] More on draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
X-BeenThere: pntaw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for practices related to proxies, NATs, TURN, and WebRTC" <pntaw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw>
List-Post: <mailto:pntaw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:08:58 -0000

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Simon Perreault <
simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> Le 2013-09-24 16:37, Oleg Moskalenko a écrit :
>  I don't think the problem is server-side. FWIW, our server has supported
> STUN auth since day one. I expect adding STUN auth to other server
> implementations would be easy.
>

Our server also supported it from the day one - but at one moment we had to
make an exception for STUN Binding request because nobody uses it with
authentication. I'll make it an option in our server.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email