Re: [pntaw] New version of draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations

Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> Sun, 22 September 2013 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mom040267@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B8021F9D46 for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajwTIgHXLloI for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515E421F9D42 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t60so1864674wes.0 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vAbUQzWEvaWBFo/+JeHTsVDPMjIMX97VgEHCawWbs40=; b=CjCqLuG5U8I80WknguP3v1x0jmBwy7NxZY4hFDBcbuuIF3m2jD0PTneZLMYVjPgVGr VZprf0P7ubOFReB1OS7UVdx/RjKj8Nkv7cSGdKtHy/X8IfP2D27t2lykjMCnoPGtTk0M mKNhoFTeBwvmYrfv38MCmH7n5o3iKSpvGmprT8EBEOvCGjmS26rFSTx+zR1AaSupUh7q 9tG0XP8BrR86ohg7Y5akZ4kptBS6eQBkl4VEgNLH+GQT/EPLJ2v6M2LSLKBO1deLr1uC LY6dwphy8nrNrDNTJnlVjREHIdZD2EdDDKCNivYOFr5YxXdncS3PHuc32niQxjFbr9FA 5X8w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.10.33 with SMTP id f1mr8105858wib.44.1379811769141; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.108.65 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALDtMrL5pT3MfbQufCphEKq0-pXj+JcfwW__wzG3T6wZ=TuWhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17BCF3A5@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <523CCD06.3030902@gmail.com> <BLU169-W136A55AC013DA147313576D93220@phx.gbl> <523CD42E.8070102@gmail.com> <BLU169-W82036280852F26ED26283C93230@phx.gbl> <523D4F17.2040202@gmail.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17BD01A8@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <CALDtMrL5pT3MfbQufCphEKq0-pXj+JcfwW__wzG3T6wZ=TuWhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:02:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CALDtMrLCKXDgeqj-G7r4Ak2Rc1ivDZMNrV+18M_W4EqyKUP4iQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c1cb6e5b4fc604e6ee7614"
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "pntaw@ietf.org" <pntaw@ietf.org>, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pntaw] New version of draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
X-BeenThere: pntaw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for practices related to proxies, NATs, TURN, and WebRTC" <pntaw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw>
List-Post: <mailto:pntaw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 01:02:53 -0000

... I was, of course, referring to the "TURN over websockets" draft, as
"this draft".


On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com>wrote:

> HTTP Connect, indeed, may allow a similar functionality. But it will
> require two things: a proxy configuration in the browsers, and an HTTP
> Proxy set by enterprise IT department. That may be a challenge for a new
> WebRTC project in an enterprise environment.
>
> This draft allows transparent connection and operation, unlike the HTTP
> proxy case.
>
> There are tools (websockify) which make possible to use this draft with
> the existing TURN servers. Putting the burden on the TURN server provider
> and maintainer is easier in most cases than negotiating new IT requirements
> with the enterprise IT managers.
>
> Of course, advanced TURN servers may include it as part of the TURN server
> implementation.
>
> Oleg
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Hutton, Andrew <
> andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I just don't see any advantage in the TURN over Websockets approach over
>> the HTTP Connect initiated tunnel which works without any new protocol and
>> therefore works with existing TURN servers.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: pntaw-bounces@ietf.org [pntaw-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of
>> Sergio Garcia Murillo [sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 8:47 AM
>> To: Bernard Aboba
>> Cc: pntaw@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [pntaw] New version of
>> draft-hutton-rtcweb-nat-firewall-considerations
>>
>> >
>> > "So in 100% cases that TURN over TLS works, TURN over (secure)
>> > websockets works too."
>> >
>> > [BA] Agree they would both traverse that firewall equally well, but
>> > TURN over (secure) websockets only works if the TURN server supports
>> > it, which most won't.   This makes mandating TURN over Webosckets
>> > support in the browser a hard sell.
>>
>> We are already working on providing a working prototype of TURN over
>> websocket that will show how easy would be to add it to both browser and
>> server. In fact, on first phase, we will not change the TURN server at
>> all but use a websockify proxy https://github.com/kanaka/websockify to
>> the WS to TCP conversion.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Sergio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pntaw mailing list
>> pntaw@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw
>> _______________________________________________
>> pntaw mailing list
>> pntaw@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw
>>
>
>