Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets
Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Fri, 30 August 2013 11:55 UTC
Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B46D21F938E for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hXqmWLiQko5m for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22f.google.com (mail-ea0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2633321F91C9 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m14so852743eaj.6 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tKj+BJusKvPMgGTZYcDqa7KkkFqgoDYXHRaRMnHWOwU=; b=qWYewSnTfildYglz/0S7OBekWLzQVEPNCg33GZ3GeTeBbMpjRrgZ4pUV9Sje7JIZmk ctTdgiF7bVN33k0CHw+A/bwFhsoQo3aUcad9S5qcQE1emtg7gCnIRG8j7SOFIFj00bfc BMlZcRLKL0bMf0H3WTOKJx9yOiyFf1aCYjN2WKq/SnK/ennk9LLhu/VyABV2X8sBtGRY lcBTEvPzTb0mR1rHUyk0Uq/Dubsv84KRSYMOsW34uVqCpS9T9P27ANhkOHAL7hpxuNt0 Z/5NKzztmVKj/rC6dImEyNfJb1vq7Pua/qYoU3+8rNPkuFpqXtSDRA+1enjUMMu0k//k uv9w==
X-Received: by 10.14.0.201 with SMTP id 49mr351406eeb.85.1377863733720; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.45] (141.Red-83-50-134.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.50.134.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a43sm54112463eep.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52208836.6050402@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:55:34 +0200
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
References: <52205AE1.9010807@gmail.com> <20130830134531.787fda3c@rainpc>
In-Reply-To: <20130830134531.787fda3c@rainpc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: pntaw@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets
X-BeenThere: pntaw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for practices related to proxies, NATs, TURN, and WebRTC" <pntaw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw>
List-Post: <mailto:pntaw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:55:45 -0000
El 30/08/2013 13:45, Lorenzo Miniero escribió: > > [..] > > I'm not an expert in websockets, which is why in my rough proposal I described a way to do this using plain HTTP, but I guess they'd be good for the purpose as well. The only doubt I have is that, as far as I know, not always websockets are able to traverse some more restrictive components: the popular BitDefender firewall, for instance, apparently doesn't let it through. From what I have seen, most people using webrtc are doing the signaling via websocket, either using SIP over websockets, or any other custom protocol. So, if websockets are not supported, you already have a problem as you will not be able to set up the SDP O/A negotiation in the first place. > Anyway, I'd personally support a work in that direction, and would be willing to help working on it too if needed. Thank you very much Lorenzo, anyone else on board? Best regards Sergio
- [pntaw] TURN over websockets Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Stach, Thomas
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Simon Perreault
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Simon Perreault
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Stach, Thomas
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Marc Blanchet
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Parthasarathi R
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Martin Thomson
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Melinda Shore
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [pntaw] TURN over websockets Simon Perreault