IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pntaw] New version of TURN over websockets draft

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 10 October 2013 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5150A11E8116 for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n+o7TE2CTxws for <pntaw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63B721E80B4 for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2537239E95A for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:23:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygwPgLqMrecQ for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:23:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.30.42.84] (unknown [62.109.39.85]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 626F439E42A for <pntaw@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:23:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <52561DBB.6010507@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:23:39 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pntaw@ietf.org
References: <5232C18C.1030102@gmail.com> <523C8BDC.6050705@petit-huguenin.org> <CALDtMrKwygUqNWKcB81F+M7Y8wBmwZtTACeYChpJVvWKbXLTEw@mail.gmail.com> <523C9B03.2030002@petit-huguenin.org> <CALDtMrJBQQZP4bbkLh6OcZhmOGFrP5bAJ8BDr0AY1zKjPXChPw@mail.gmail.com> <523CAC92.2070102@petit-huguenin.org> <523CB114.20106@gmail.com> <523CB437.6000806@petit-huguenin.org> <CALDtMr+Fc3G-H--n7DuKPMzx-6fo_XweuYd=LxdjRp+tgB_3NQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALDtMr+Fc3G-H--n7DuKPMzx-6fo_XweuYd=LxdjRp+tgB_3NQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090301010501060904090303"
Subject: Re: [pntaw] New version of TURN over websockets draft
X-BeenThere: pntaw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for practices related to proxies, NATs, TURN, and WebRTC" <pntaw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw>
List-Post: <mailto:pntaw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pntaw>, <mailto:pntaw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 03:23:52 -0000

On 09/20/2013 11:12 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
> RFC 6062 is not very important but I cannot say that it is not relevant. For the purpose of the new
proposal we do not make a distinction between RFC 5766 and RFC 6062 -
this new proposal is about a new TURN transport (Websockets). This
transport is supposed to work universally in all accepted TURN RFCs. So
it would be unnatural and illogical to remove RFC 6062 from the draft.
>


Note that the -transport- draft currently has RFC 5766 support as MUST,
while
RFC 6062 support is a MAY.

The main purpose of mentioning RFC 6062 in the draft is to show that
it's been mentioned in discussion, and that the WG has consensus to not
make it anything stronger than a MAY.

(I think it would be very strange if we were to attempt to forbid it.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email