Re: Transition

Einar Stefferud <Stef=poised@nma.com> Thu, 12 November 1992 10:33 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01331; 12 Nov 92 5:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01322; 12 Nov 92 5:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03304; 12 Nov 92 5:34 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01317; 12 Nov 92 5:33 EST
Received: from ics.uci.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03293; 12 Nov 92 5:34 EST
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id an07646; 12 Nov 92 2:16 PST
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa21272; 12 Nov 92 1:57 PST
To: Dennis Perry <perry@mcl.unisys.com>
cc: crocker@tis.com, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Transition
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:46:33 -0500. <9211111046.AA24352@kauai.MCL.Unisys.COM>
Reply-to: Stef=poised@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef=poised@nma.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 01:57:57 -0800
Message-ID: <21270.721562277@nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com

Sorry Dennis -- I really meant to limit my assertion to ISOC...

> Steff, you mention that the IETF has not necessarily given concent
> to be governed by the ISOC/IAB.  I won't comment on the ISOC part, but
> the IAB part is surly not true. 

Yo are correct, of course...

I apologize for giving you a false alarm.	Cheers...\Stef