Re: Selection Process

Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com> Wed, 25 November 1992 20:51 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08694; 25 Nov 92 15:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08683; 25 Nov 92 15:51 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27573; 25 Nov 92 15:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08669; 25 Nov 92 15:50 EST
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27538; 25 Nov 92 15:51 EST
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA02923@xap.xyplex.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 92 16:47:55 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1992 16:47:55 -0500
Message-Id: <9211252147.AA02923@xap.xyplex.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: Stephen D Crocker's message of Wed, 25 Nov 92 12:20:45 -0500 <9211251720.AA16809@TIS.COM>
Subject: Re: Selection Process

I'd like to put in a word for the sentiment from the plenary that perhaps we
don't need the recall procedure.  The two year term supplies a natural point
for graceful resignation or failure to be reappointed.  It's not clear to me
that we are likely to have a problem so pressing as to require an ever-present
threat of public accusation, trial, and crucifixion.

I'd like to see us come to a consensus that the recall procedure isn't worth
its painful implications and potential.

	Bob