Re: Too many changes?

"practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net" <brunner@practic.practic.com> Tue, 10 November 1992 00:49 UTC

Message-Id: <9211100052.AA25839@practic.practic.com>
To: "Ole J. Jacobsen" <uunet!csli.stanford.edu!ole@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: bsimpson@angband.stanford.edu, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, brunner@practic.practic.com
Subject: Re: Too many changes?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Nov 92 16:05:21 PST." <CMM.0.90.4.721353921.ole@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 16:52:05 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net" <brunner@practic.practic.com>

Ole,

You may want to point out to the general reader that IOP was unwilling to
provide its own numbers to the pre-1992 shownet group. If you are keen on
Bill's input, you might want to ask Ziff-Davis management for permission
to supply that data to him. I'm sure that Z-D and Bill can NDA each other,
and that Bill and Z-D can reach some kind of fee agreement.

As to why Bill might want to "replace" your company, I can't even guess,
however, I read his note as implying that funding for the IETF may be
obtained from the NSF (well, perhaps the NREN), or from end-user-paid
activities, of which NetWorld, CommNet, Connectathon, and InterOp, are
all example integrated "vendor/tutorial/pannel" events.

In any event, IOP is not the focus of POISED, back to the main thread...

Eric

Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
Re: Too many changes? Carl Malamud
Re: Too many changes? William Allen Simpson
Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
Re: Too many changes? Ole J. Jacobsen
Re: Too many changes? practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net
Re: Too many changes? practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net
Re: Too many changes? Vinton G. Cerf
Re: Too many changes? Einar Stefferud
Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
Re: Too many changes? William Allen Simpson
Re: Too many changes? Steve Kent
Re: Too many changes? Marshall Rose
Re: Too many changes? Steve Kent