Re: Submission of charter for POISON
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Wed, 01 May 1996 17:33 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22501; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22495; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09752; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22461; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22456; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from ng.netgate.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09744; 1 May 96 13:33 EDT
Received: from [205.214.160.80] (d46.netgate.net [205.214.160.80]) by ng.netgate.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA27805; Wed, 1 May 1996 10:32:39 -0700
X-Sender: dcrocker@ng.netgate.net
Message-Id: <v03006608adad4488bf7f@[205.214.160.91]>
In-Reply-To: <2.2.16.19960429114721.3d9715de@mail1.reston.mci.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 10:30:53 -0700
To: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: Submission of charter for POISON
Cc: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet ExpertiseCentrum bv)" <Erik.Huizer@sec.nl>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, IESG <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, poised@tis.com
At 4:47 AM -0700 4/29/96, John C Klensin wrote: >I'm going to stick my neck out and argue that it is not desirable to charter >this as a WG at this time (although I like the name). Three reasons: I agree with John. The draft charter cites two kinds of work for the proposed working group: 1. Getting other groups to do writing 2. Writing some docuents that MIGHT become necessary I believe that the former documents do need writing and the latter probably will become necessary, but charters need to define specfic deliverables for a working group and the draft charter has to do with "managing" and with possibilities. Until a firm set of hard deliverables -- for which the working group is directly responsible -- become clear, I suggest that the chartering be deferred. d/ -------------------- Dave Crocker +1 408 246 8253 Brandenburg Consulting fax: +1 408 249 6205 675 Spruce Dr. dcrocker@brandenburg.com Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA http://www.brandenburg.com Internet Mail Consortium http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org
- Re: Submission of charter for POISON Dave Crocker
- Re: Submission of charter for POISON Robert Elz