IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Transition

Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com> Sun, 08 November 1992 01:58 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03812; 7 Nov 92 20:58 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03803; 7 Nov 92 20:58 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17589; 7 Nov 92 20:59 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03798; 7 Nov 92 20:58 EST
Received: from trystero.malamud.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17584; 7 Nov 92 20:59 EST
Received: by malamud.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA20885; Sat, 7 Nov 92 21:05:35 EST
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 21:05:35 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>
Message-Id: <9211080205.AA20885@malamud.com>
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Transition

Stef -

I know of at least five trustees that will be at the IETF.  ISOC
already posted an election plan for 5 new trustees.  We know there is an
ISOC-IETF problem, but let's try to focus on fixing it.

Steve and I suggested many changes to the ISOC and my feedback so far
is that the changes are workable.  Would you feel the changes make ISOC
the kind of organization you'd feel comfortable working within?  If so,
let's agree on what those changes are and send a clear message out.

Winston Churchill once said:

	"If we only quarrel between the present and the past,
	 we must lose the future."

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status