IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Selection Process

Jim Barnes <barnes@xylogics.com> Wed, 25 November 1992 22:08 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09640; 25 Nov 92 17:08 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09629; 25 Nov 92 17:08 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04617; 25 Nov 92 17:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09624; 25 Nov 92 17:08 EST
Received: from atlas.xylogics.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04603; 25 Nov 92 17:08 EST
Received: from spock.xylogics.com by atlas.xylogics.com with SMTP id AA24800 (5.65c/UK-2.1-921001); Wed, 25 Nov 1992 17:10:39 -0500
Received: by spock.xylogics.com id AA03673 (4.1/UK-2.1-920729); Wed, 25 Nov 92 17:08:54 EST
Message-Id: <3673.9211252208@spock.xylogics.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jim Barnes <barnes@xylogics.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1992 17:08:53 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.1.0 4/25/90)
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Selection Process

My understanding from the discussion at last week's IETF is that (under the
new world order) each area will have an area director, who is a member of 
the IESG, and an area directorate.  Do we need to define how the area 
directorate is selected?  Can that be left to the discretion of each 
area director?  Is it something that the IESG should define?

  Jim Barnes (barnes@xylogics.com)

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status