IETF Logo Mail Archive

re: Transition

Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com> Tue, 10 November 1992 16:16 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05506; 10 Nov 92 11:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05497; 10 Nov 92 11:16 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09830; 10 Nov 92 11:17 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05492; 10 Nov 92 11:15 EST
Received: from uu2.psi.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09807; 10 Nov 92 11:16 EST
Received: from port12.sunnyvale.pub-ip.psi.net by uu2.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) id AA25248; Tue, 10 Nov 92 11:16:13 -0500
Received: by aland.bbn.com (4.1/3.1.090690-BBN) id AA18765; Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:14:50 PST
Message-Id: <9211101614.AA18765@aland.bbn.com>
To: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
Cc: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: re: Transition
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:14:49 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: craig@aland.bbn.com

> Why are so many people trying to avoid facing the question?

Stef:

    You misunderstood me.  I too share concerns about ISOC (and have said
so before).  However, I've largely been convinced that trying to fix it
from inside is the right thing -- and suspect others have too.  In such
situations, I prefer the brisk approach.  There's not a lot of plenary
time, and I'd prefer to spend it on more serious issues in the POISED report.

Craig

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status