Re: David's comments
"Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Tue, 01 December 1992 12:59 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01612; 1 Dec 92 7:59 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01601; 1 Dec 92 7:59 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04400; 1 Dec 92 8:00 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01590; 1 Dec 92 7:59 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04363; 1 Dec 92 7:59 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01584; 1 Dec 92 7:58 EST
To: Stef=poised@nma.com
cc: Carl Malamud <malamud@csn.org>, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: David's comments
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Dec 92 01:07:46 PST." <18743.723200866@nma.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 07:58:29 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9212010758.aa01584@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Stef, I forwarded David Brandin's note to the Poised list after asking David if his message could be shared more widely. It seemed to me that the WG members should be kept informed of the various inputs that are coming to the isoc trustees regarding poised. I agree with Carl's observation that David's reactions may have been in large measure the result of misunderstanding the list of agreed points as a detailed set of bylaws or procedures. We've come a long way in the last several months - and we still have a good deal of work to do to put the agreement we have in principle into a form we can act on. Vint
- David's comments Carl Malamud
- Re: David's comments Einar Stefferud
- Re: David's comments Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: David's comments Christian Huitema