Re: Transition

Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com> Mon, 09 November 1992 14:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15526; 9 Nov 92 9:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15516; 9 Nov 92 9:54 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26330; 9 Nov 92 9:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15509; 9 Nov 92 9:54 EST
Received: from TIS.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26300; 9 Nov 92 9:55 EST
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA21942; Mon, 9 Nov 92 09:54:50 EST
Message-Id: <9211091454.AA21942@TIS.COM>
To: Stef=poised@nma.com
Cc: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Transition
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 09 Nov 92 00:54:39 -0800. <12440.721299279@nma.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 09:54:47 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>

Stef,

Ah, I see.  I, and I think Carl, are working on the basis that the
IAB, IRTF and IETF had already been attached to the ISOC.  That's the
status quo; all else would be a change.

Steve