IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Transition

Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com> Tue, 10 November 1992 00:46 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26779; 9 Nov 92 19:46 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26768; 9 Nov 92 19:46 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14576; 9 Nov 92 19:47 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26753; 9 Nov 92 19:46 EST
Received: from uu2.psi.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14548; 9 Nov 92 19:46 EST
Received: from port12.sunnyvale.pub-ip.psi.net by uu2.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) id AA10580; Mon, 9 Nov 92 19:46:47 -0500
Received: by aland.bbn.com (4.1/3.1.090690-BBN) id AA15618; Mon, 9 Nov 92 16:45:18 PST
Message-Id: <9211100045.AA15618@aland.bbn.com>
To: Stef@nma.com
Cc: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Transition
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 09 Nov 92 15:10:37 -0800. <14029.721350637@nma.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 16:45:18 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: craig@aland.bbn.com

Hi Stef:
    
    Regarding ISOC.  It seems to me that the draft makes clear what the
conditions that IETF believes ISOC should meet to be credible as the home
for IETF.

    If IETF endorses the POISED report, one can view it as accepting ISOC
(provide ISOC meets IETF's requirements).  I understand that's not quite
as explicit as a separate vote yes/no on ISOC chartering, but seems quite
sufficient to me.

Craig

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status