Re: Too many changes?
"Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Tue, 10 November 1992 13:25 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01022; 10 Nov 92 8:25 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01013; 10 Nov 92 8:25 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04579; 10 Nov 92 8:26 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01003; 10 Nov 92 8:25 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04559; 10 Nov 92 8:26 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00996; 10 Nov 92 8:25 EST
To: bsimpson@angband.stanford.edu
cc: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Too many changes?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Nov 92 17:39:15 EDT." <895.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:25:11 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9211100825.aa00996@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Bill, NSF, DOE, NASA and DARPA have provided support for IAB and IETF functions for many years, and for the IETF secretariat, specifically, since about 1988. In my earlier message, I mentioned that these agencies would like to see non-federal funding begin to take up the burden, and I believe this to be a very reasonable position. Vint
- Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Too many changes? Carl Malamud
- Re: Too many changes? William Allen Simpson
- Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Too many changes? Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: Too many changes? practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net
- Re: Too many changes? practic!brunner@uunet.uu.net
- Re: Too many changes? Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: Too many changes? Einar Stefferud
- Too many changes? Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Too many changes? William Allen Simpson
- Re: Too many changes? Steve Kent
- Re: Too many changes? Marshall Rose
- Re: Too many changes? Steve Kent