POISED Review by ISOC Trustees
"Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Sat, 05 December 1992 16:38 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02895; 5 Dec 92 11:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02886; 5 Dec 92 11:38 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09200; 5 Dec 92 11:39 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02880; 5 Dec 92 11:38 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09189; 5 Dec 92 11:39 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02870; 5 Dec 92 11:38 EST
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: POISED Review by ISOC Trustees
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1992 11:38:28 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9212051138.aa02870@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Just so everyone's clear on this - I don't know what the outcome of the review will be, but if the Trustees have questions or suggestions for change, these will be fed back to the poised wg. I'm hoping for some kind of agreement in principle from the trustees for moving ahead with the proposed changes. Vint
- POISED Review by ISOC Trustees Vinton G. Cerf