Re: Selection Process

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Wed, 25 November 1992 15:07 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04323; 25 Nov 92 10:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04308; 25 Nov 92 10:07 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11592; 25 Nov 92 10:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04286; 25 Nov 92 10:07 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11574; 25 Nov 92 10:07 EST
Received: by ftp.com id AA26006; Wed, 25 Nov 92 10:07:19 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1992 10:07:19 -0500
Message-Id: <9211251507.AA26006@ftp.com>
To: carl@malamud.com
Subject: Re: Selection Process
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr, carl@malamud.com, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US


 > I'm a little less clear on having 2 IAB and 2 IESG act as liaisons.  I
 > raised this point several times and the initial reaction I got from
 > several people was that 4 "old boys" could unduly influence the
 > committee.

The Nominating Committee could certainly ask for help -- if it deemed it
necessary -- from other people. This help could be in the form of information
("What do you think about so-and-so?") or it could be procedural in nature,
or it could be of the form "Help us convince so-and-so to be on the IAB".

These "helpers" would obviously operate under the constraints of the
nominating committee as a whole. They would not, however, be a part of
the actual decision -- in effect they would be like the judge, lawyers
and witnesses in an American trial.

--
Frank Kastenholz