Re: WG guidelines DRAFT!
Scott_Brim@cornell.edu Thu, 14 January 1993 19:15 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26533; 14 Jan 93 14:15 EST
Received: from MITCHELL.CIT.CORNELL.EDU by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26501; 14 Jan 93 14:15 EST
Received: from MITCHELL.CIT.CORNELL.EDU by mitchell.cit.cornell.edu (4.1/1.34/Honig-1.3) id AA12806; Thu, 14 Jan 93 14:16:13 EST
Message-Id: <9301141916.AA12806@mitchell.cit.cornell.edu>
To: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Cc: poised@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott_Brim@cornell.edu
Subject: Re: WG guidelines DRAFT!
In-Reply-To: Fred Baker's message of Thu, 14 Jan 1993 14:10:25 -0500. <9301141910.AA00996@saffron.acc.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1993 14:16:11 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: swb@nr-tech.cit.cornell.edu
OK -- as long as "not meeting" does *not* mean "not working", eh? Scott >I think we're saying the same thing. "Dormant" to me means "not meeting".
- WG guidelines DRAFT! Erik Huizer
- Re: WG guidelines DRAFT! Frank Kastenholz
- Re: WG guidelines DRAFT! Fred Baker
- Re: WG guidelines DRAFT! Scott_Brim
- Re: WG guidelines DRAFT! Fred Baker
- Re: WG guidelines DRAFT! Scott_Brim