Re: Paying our way
Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com> Wed, 11 November 1992 01:54 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23257; 10 Nov 92 20:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23248; 10 Nov 92 20:54 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26826; 10 Nov 92 20:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23241; 10 Nov 92 20:54 EST
Received: from trystero.malamud.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26821; 10 Nov 92 20:55 EST
Received: by malamud.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA23286; Tue, 10 Nov 92 21:01:44 EST
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 21:01:44 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>
Message-Id: <9211110201.AA23286@malamud.com>
To: bsimpson@angband.stanford.edu, vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Paying our way
Cc: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Bill - Today INTEROP, tommorrow the world. We have enough problems inside the IETF without tackling ever broader circles. I know it is tempting to use POISED as a forum for venting all dissatisfaction with all things networking, but it is always useful to pause and ponder the words of the other Simpson: "Don't have a cow, man." We should focus on issues that we have some power to correct. For example, we have an opportunity to help influence how the ISOC functions at the same time as we consider what our own internal structure ought to be. While I hear dissatisfaction from you and Stef on ISOC, I'm unable to identify specific aspects of ISOC that can be corrected that would make you feel better about the organization. Do you have any specific suggestions? Carl
- Paying our way William Allen Simpson
- Re: Paying our way Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: Paying our way Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: Paying our way Carl Malamud
- Re: Paying our way Einar Stefferud
- Re: Paying our way Carl Malamud
- Re: Paying our way Einar Stefferud
- Re: Paying our way Vinton G. Cerf