[Policy] Questions about policy rule's ldap direct ory mapping
"" <cyl_policy@126.com> Wed, 06 December 2006 13:56 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrxFt-0005as-7k; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:56:13 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrxFr-0005am-Py for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:56:11 -0500
Received: from m15-53.126.com ([220.181.15.53]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrxFn-0008Lh-Pz for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:56:11 -0500
Received: from 192.168.201.53(222.212.215.148) ( 192.168.201.53(222.212.215.148) [192.168.201.53(222.212.215.148)] ) by webmail-app53 (Coremail) ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:55:57 +0800 (CST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4576CBED.00004A.08367@bj126app53.126.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:55:57 +0800
From: cyl_policy@126.com
To: policy group <policy@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.201.53(222.212.215.148)]
X-Mailer: <!-- CoreMail Version 3.1_dev Copyright (c) 2002-2006 www.mailtech.cn --> 126com
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 9a2be21919e71dc6faef12b370c4ecf5
Subject: [Policy] Questions about policy rule's ldap direct ory mapping
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1029602983=="
Errors-To: policy-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all,
In rfc3703(Policy Core LDAP Schema), there is a policy rule Rule1 with one rule-specific condition CA and one rule-specific action AB as following:
+-----+
|Rule1|
| |
+-----|- -|-----+
| +-----+ |
| * * |
| * * |
| **** **** |
| * * |
v * * v
+--------+ +--------+
| CA+ca | | AB+ab |
+--------+ +--------+
+------------------------------+
|LEGEND: |
| ***** DIT containment |
| + auxiliary attachment |
| ----> DN reference |
+------------------------------+
In the above, ca and ab are auxiliary classes which represent policy condtion and policy action seperately, and, CA and AB are structual classes which represent associations between Rule1 and ca, and between Rule1 and ab.
Could anyone tell me what's the Policy Object Hierarchy in ldap directory for the example above? Especialy, how CA+ca is represented?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Yulei
_______________________________________________ Policy mailing list Policy@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy