IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt

"John Strassner" <John.Strassner@intelliden.com> Thu, 06 May 2004 00:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21476 for <policy-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2004 20:06:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BLWM1-0007vN-4D for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 20:03:10 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i46039Kh030462 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 5 May 2004 20:03:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BLWIz-0006jb-GB; Wed, 05 May 2004 20:00:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BLWHR-0005yk-2A for policy@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 19:58:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA21086 for <policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2004 19:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BLWHP-0006yi-8w for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 19:58:23 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BLWGS-0006eI-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 19:57:25 -0400
Received: from cosium03.intelliden.net ([12.41.186.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BLWFn-0006Jf-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 19:56:43 -0400
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C432FC.8567DB60"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Subject: RE: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 17:56:02 -0600
Message-ID: <AE723009E85E224CB00132C7FF0B34E1010E8657@cosium02.intelliden.net>
Thread-Topic: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt
Thread-Index: AcQyplwe3ZKQUfbaQR6ZZj+Le1T/XgAJ/MPgAAuG1oA=
From: John Strassner <John.Strassner@intelliden.com>
To: John Strassner <John.Strassner@intelliden.com>, mpana@metasolv.com, policy@ietf.org, John Strassner <John.Strassner@intelliden.com>
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com, joel@stevecrocker.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: policy-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: policy-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Resending, since original email was too long...
 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Strassner 
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:26 PM
To: mpana@metasolv.com; policy@ietf.org; 'John Strassner'
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; joel@stevecrocker.com
Subject: RE: [Policy] FW: I-D
ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt



Sorry, I've been swamped. I'll reply to this thread later today, and try
and review your draft again this weekend.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: mpana@metasolv.com [mailto:mpana@metasolv.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 7:31 AM
To: John Strassner; policy@ietf.org
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; joel@stevecrocker.com
Subject: RE: [Policy] FW: I-D
ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt



John,
 
Is there going to be a follow-up on this message thread? If not, we will
issue one more (minor) revision of PCELS  to address the "MUST
contradicts the first SHOULD" issue as discussed below. Then, we would
ask for Joel's recommendation wrt. advancing the draft to the next
stage.
 
Thanks,
Mircea.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email