Re: [Policy] pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer
Ryan Moats <rmoats@lemurnetworks.net> Mon, 16 February 2004 02:42 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA10200 for <policy-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsYhu-0001vV-5S for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:42:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1G2g2pM007376 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:42:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsYht-0001uf-Gw; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:42:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsYgx-0001mX-Od for policy@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA10144 for <policy@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsYgu-0004MJ-00 for policy@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AsYg6-0004Ik-00 for policy@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:40:10 -0500
Received: from tconl91223.tconl.com ([204.26.91.223]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsYfk-0004EA-00 for policy@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:39:48 -0500
Received: by tconl91223.tconl.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5EC5B24086; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:39:18 -0600 (CST)
From: Ryan Moats <rmoats@lemurnetworks.net>
Organization: Lemur Networks, Inc.
To: mpana@metasolv.com, policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Policy] pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:39:16 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <A33EE5A81E634B488B099FD31F65196101241C37@srvotemail.metasolv.com>
In-Reply-To: <A33EE5A81E634B488B099FD31F65196101241C37@srvotemail.metasolv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200402152039.17639.rmoats@lemurnetworks.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: policy-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: policy-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sunday 15 February 2004 08:04 pm, mpana@metasolv.com wrote: > The open issue #4 listed in Appendix B) in PCELS-04 refers to the proposed > implementation for the ReusablePolicyContainer class. The authors have > reached an impasse and would appreciate input from the WG wrt. the options > presented below. I'll admit to not being an implementer of PCELS (either currently or planned). Having said that, if I were going to implement PCELS on top of my PCLS implementation, I don't really see the difference between the two approaches. The same entry could be designated both pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer independent of the two options. Color me confused because this really looks like a nit. Ryan _______________________________________________ Policy mailing list Policy@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy