[Policy] PCELS and PCLS
mpana@metasolv.com Wed, 28 January 2004 17:35 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15974 for <policy-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:35:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Altaq-0007iR-J5 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:35:12 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0SHZCBW029653 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:35:12 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Altah-0007hn-RH; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:35:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AltaW-0007ei-HJ for policy@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15937 for <policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:48 -0500 (EST)
From: mpana@metasolv.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AltaU-00042k-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:34:50 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AltZY-0003wx-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:33:53 -0500
Received: from passwd.metasolv.com ([216.30.145.17] helo=srvplemail2.metasolv.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AltYk-0003kY-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:33:02 -0500
Received: by passwd.metasolv.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <DQV3P1TR>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:32:40 -0600
Message-ID: <A33EE5A81E634B488B099FD31F65196101241BF0@srvotemail.metasolv.com>
To: policy@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:27:40 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3E5C4.07D44B50"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Policy] PCELS and PCLS
Sender: policy-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: policy-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
PCLS implementers, The main issue that was expressed relative to the previous revision (-03) of PCELS was its "unfriendly" position relative to PCLS. PCELS has been changed (-04) to address this issue and a new section was specifically added to the document for discussing the [non]impact of PCELS on PCLS implementations. Has anybody had the chance to read the -04 revision? Do you find the new approach acceptable? In particular, are there any comments regarding the provisions of section "4.3 Impact on existing implementations of the Policy Core LDAP Schema"? Thank You, Mircea Pana.
- [Policy] PCELS and PCLS mpana
- Re: [Policy] PCELS and PCLS Larry S. Bartz