IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: a different tack

Steve Dorner <sdorner@qualcomm.com> Tue, 14 June 1994 21:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09617; 14 Jun 94 17:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09613; 14 Jun 94 17:15 EDT
Received: from PO5.ANDREW.CMU.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16073; 14 Jun 94 17:15 EDT
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po5.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) id RAA27628; Tue, 14 Jun 1994 17:13:05 -0400
Received: via switchmail for ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu; Tue, 14 Jun 1994 17:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po2.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/q003/QF.ghzVnUi00Uda5Rmk5n>; Tue, 14 Jun 1994 17:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (ux1.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.59]) by po2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA24006 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>; Tue, 14 Jun 1994 17:10:51 -0400
Received: from dorner.slip.uiuc.edu by ux1.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA11953 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>); Tue, 14 Jun 1994 16:10:21 -0500
Received: from [192.17.5.10] by dorner.slip.uiuc.edu with SMTP id AA07787 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>); Tue, 14 Jun 1994 16:10:26 -0500
X-Sender: sdorner@192.17.5.1
Message-Id: <aa23cc230a02101773c3@[192.17.5.10]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 1994 16:17:04 -0500
To: ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Dorner <sdorner@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: a different tack

My feeling is that, without UIDL, the clarified POP3 protocol is less
functional than what I'm using now.  I really would *rather* that it didn't
go to standard.

So I have no objection at all to UIDL setting the RFC back a level, if
that's what happens.

--
Steve Dorner, Qualcomm Incorporated
 "There's nothing wrong with you that can't be cured
  with a little Prozac and a polo mallet." - Woody Allen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email