Re: pop3 changes

Michael Scott Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu> Mon, 06 June 1994 22:33 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10455; 6 Jun 94 18:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10451; 6 Jun 94 18:33 EDT
Received: from ANDREW.CMU.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25554; 6 Jun 94 18:33 EDT
Received: (from postman@localhost) by andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) id SAA15243; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:32:12 -0400
Received: via switchmail for ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:32:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from po2.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/q001/QF.shwuBlm00Uda81Ek5W>; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:30:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from harper-hall.cit.cornell.edu (HARPER-HALL.CIT.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.69.171]) by po2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA00318 for <ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu>; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:30:00 -0400
Received: from harper-hall.cit.cornell.edu ([132.236.69.171]) by harper-hall.cit.cornell.edu with SMTP id <338183-1>; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:29:50 -0400
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 1994 18:29:29 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Michael Scott Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
X-Orig-Sender: Michael Scott Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
Reply-To: Michael Scott Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: pop3 changes
To: Michael D'Errico <Mike@software.com>
cc: brtmac@ksu.ksu.edu, ietf-pop3@andrew.cmu.edu
In-Reply-To: <19940606051412.AAA4164@rome.software.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07-CIT.9406061833.B14383-9100000@harper-hall.cit.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

On Mon, 6 Jun 1994, Michael D'Errico wrote:

> This is a problem of user education, not Eudora nor the Post Office Protocol.
> Why not hand everybody a sheet of paper with instructions on it when you open
> a mail account for them?

I'm not in favor of using XTND XMIT at all, but I *do* have an answer to
this question: Because nobody READS the damned things. We've got all sorts
of documentation, some short and sweet, some in more detail, all fairly
well written. Nobody reads it.