Re: TOP second argument

John Gardiner Myers <jgm+@cmu.edu> Sat, 04 June 1994 04:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22286; 4 Jun 94 0:29 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22282; 4 Jun 94 0:29 EDT
Received: from PO6.ANDREW.CMU.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26509; 4 Jun 94 0:29 EDT
Received: (from postman@localhost) by po6.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.7/8.6.6) id AAA13209; Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:28:30 -0400
Received: via switchmail; Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/testq0/QF.4hw0=1q00WBw0Abk4D>; Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:27:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr7/jm36/.Outgoing/QF.whw0:OK00WBwMAaoVS>; Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:27:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:27:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <chw0_Ma00WBwAAaoIh@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 1994 00:27:04 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John Gardiner Myers <jgm+@cmu.edu>
To: POP3 IETF Mailing List <ietf-pop3+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: TOP second argument
In-Reply-To: <aa155379020210169a30@[192.17.5.3]>
References: <aa155379020210169a30@[192.17.5.3]>
Beak: Is

I read it as being valid--zero is in fact a number.  I would suggest
clarifying the document such "TOP 1 0" is explicitly valid.

-- 
_.John G. Myers		Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU
			LoseNet:  ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up