IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pop3ext] UIDL response to CAPA command

Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@oracle.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.shannon@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: pop3ext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pop3ext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7017721F89BC for <pop3ext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fo3BzS6oGpjC for <pop3ext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A6E21F8957 for <pop3ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qAELG5Na024497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <pop3ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:16:06 GMT
Received: from datsunx.us.oracle.com (datsunx.us.oracle.com [10.132.180.90]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAELG3XW000907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pop3ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:16:05 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by datsunx.us.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAELG2bx007553; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50A40A12.600@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:02 -0800
From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120731 Thunderbird/10.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pop3ext@ietf.org
References: <50A409B1.9020702@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <50A409B1.9020702@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Subject: Re: [pop3ext] UIDL response to CAPA command
X-BeenThere: pop3ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions and updates to Post Office Protocol \(POP3\)" <pop3ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pop3ext>, <mailto:pop3ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pop3ext>
List-Post: <mailto:pop3ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pop3ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pop3ext>, <mailto:pop3ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:16:08 -0000

Oops, I meant RFC 2449.

Bill Shannon wrote on 11/14/12 13:14:
> Does RFC 2994 allow the UIDL capability to be missing from a CAPA
> response before authentication, but included in a CAPA response
> after authentication?
> 
> Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email