Re: [port-srv-reg] final updates - ports doc

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Joe,

Joe Touch wrote:
 [...]

>All the items above except for "Comments" are described in the doc, and
>constitute the registration information. The comments field should, IMO,
>be broken down into a few separate fields; I'm not sure any of these
>need to be listed in the doc, however, since the information it presents
>is administrative 'out-of-band' context.
>  
>
Do we need to be that strict about what can go into Comments?
I am fine with your proposal as well, but I don't think limiting scope 
of comments would be helpful to IANA. Michelle?

>Here's what I would break it into two fields:
>
>	Known Unauthorized Uses
>	Assignment comments (de-registration, owner change, name change)
>
>I'm not sure it's appropriate to list the known unauthorized uses in the
>same table as the authorized ones; I would prefer de-valuing that list
>to a separate table on a separate page.
>
Works for me. Documenting unauthorized uses might be of value and I 
agree that keeping it separate is sensible.