Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative Contact" and "Technical Contact"
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 21:28 UTC
Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 33FA03A6AA9 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-105.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.904, BAYES_20=-0.74,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIMKRvN7GKnV for
<port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E34A3A6B2A for
<port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay15.apple.com (relay15.apple.com [17.128.113.54]) by
mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC08DA89DA7A;
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7b3eae0000066cf-22-4c8fe912f447
Received: from [17.202.46.71] (chesh1.apple.com [17.202.46.71]) by
relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 63.E4.26319.219EF8C4;
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <4C88FE1D.1050609@isi.edu>
References: <11ED4B07-AABE-4F4F-BED0-41BBDBF2ABE8@apple.com>
<05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D34108316E@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
<4C88FE1D.1050609@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <4C6EAD67-2F1C-49F3-A789-07E69DFB466B@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:28:49 -0700
To: port-srv-reg@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>,
Mark Mcfadden <mark.mcfadden@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding "Administrative
Contact" and "Technical Contact"
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port
registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>,
<mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:28:26 -0000
On 9 Sep, 2010, at 08:32, Joe Touch wrote:
> FWIW, I'm a bit confused by the current terms. I think we all
> understand the goal - a tech contact and an owner.
Except it's not an "owner", because we have, in previous versions of
the draft, taken pains to stress that no one except IANA "owns" a
port or service name:
It is important to note that ownership of registered port numbers
and
service names remains with IANA.
Can we get some agreement on the terminology and concepts here?
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org
- [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regarding… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Mark Mcfadden
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Michelle Cotton
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Joe Touch
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Inconsistent terminology regar… Michelle Cotton