IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Slides for TSVWG on draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 22 March 2010 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14643A6911 for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.075
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.075 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.095, BAYES_05=-1.11, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcbaXDOiWfBZ for <port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807BA3A6807 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.26.83] (dhcp-wireless-open-abg-26-83.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.26.83]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S6b6yQAu7sfQ@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:06:21 +0000
Message-ID: <4BA6FAB6.10101@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:05:58 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 SeaMonkey/1.1.15
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <4BA56C8A.30205@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BA56C8A.30205@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Slides for TSVWG on draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:06:12 -0000

Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked through the emails I had in my folders and constructed the
> attached slides. As TSVWG is on Monday we don't have a lot of time. My
> question to all of you are that you help identify the ones that aren't
> simple editorial and where we might not have consensus.
>
> Please rehash these slides in anyway you want.
I only have 1 general comment about your slides (which look fine 
otherwise). It would be nice to know how you suggest to address various 
issue. Your slides list all issues, but they don't say if all issues 
will be addressed.

I personally think that not all of them should be addressed. For example 
I am not convinced that the reference to 
draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify needs to be normative.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email