Re: [port-srv-reg] Slides for TSVWG on draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports

Magnus,
slides look fine, you are missing the action item that I requested that
the draft contain the format of the registry so Alfred and I can 
generate the registry clean-up document that will update this document 
and move registrations around etc.

	Olafur

On 22/03/2010 12:35 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Update version of the slides
>
> Magnus
>
> Magnus Westerlund skrev 2010-03-22 08:47:
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> The slides was a start collecting the issues. I was hoping that someone
>> would pick it up and do a pass over them to create something more useful.
>>
>> Regarding the reference. We clearly have interactions between the
>> documents and those needs to be sorted out. One possibility that I
>> proposed was that Olafurs document would need to update this one as it
>> comes out. But see discussion on TSVWG mailing list.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Magnus
>>
>> Alexey Melnikov skrev 2010-03-21 22:05:
>>> Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I looked through the emails I had in my folders and constructed the
>>>> attached slides. As TSVWG is on Monday we don't have a lot of time. My
>>>> question to all of you are that you help identify the ones that aren't
>>>> simple editorial and where we might not have consensus.
>>>>
>>>> Please rehash these slides in anyway you want.
>>> I only have 1 general comment about your slides (which look fine
>>> otherwise). It would be nice to know how you suggest to address various
>>> issue. Your slides list all issues, but they don't say if all issues
>>> will be addressed.
>>>
>>> I personally think that not all of them should be addressed. For example
>>> I am not convinced that the reference to
>>> draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify needs to be normative.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg